Trump’s Dismissal of Zelensky Sparks GOP Justifications and Threatens U.S. Alliances

 Trump’s Dismissal of Zelensky Sparks GOP Justifications and Threatens U.S. Alliances

U.S. President Donald Trump (right) and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky meet in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington on Feb. 28. Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

In a move that sent shockwaves through Washington, former President Donald Trump publicly reprimanded Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and dismissed him from the White House last week after Zelensky sought a security agreement.

The incident has left many Republican lawmakers—who have been vocal in supporting Ukraine’s defense against Russian aggression—scrambling to justify Trump’s stance, conservative analyst Noah Rothman argued in a scathing column for the National Review on Monday.

More: EU Diplomat Fires Back at Trump After He Claims Europe Was Made to Screw the US
More: Hillary Clinton Takes a Sharp Jab at Trump Over His Soft Spot for Putin

According to Rothman, Trump’s allies sought to discredit Zelensky by nitpicking his behavior, attempting to shift blame for the tense encounter. “He didn’t forgo the military-style attire he has worn since the outbreak of Russia’s second invasion of Ukraine in the Oval Office.

If he didn’t want to imperil his country’s security, perhaps he should have dressed less provocatively,” wrote Rothman. Rothman also pointed out that Zelensky’s visible frustration during Trump’s condescending lecture was seized upon as further justification for his treatment. “Zelensky is alleged to have rolled his eyes when he was being lectured so sanctimoniously about his selfish refusal to consign his countrymen to persecution and subjugation.

He had the temerity to ignite the blowup by asking about the extent to which Russia can be trusted not to violate a cease-fire as it did previous cease-fires (repeatedly and in ways the international community dared not acknowledge for fear of the consequences) in the absence of American security guarantees.”

Trump and Zelensky
(Getty Images)

Trump’s reaction to Zelensky’s inquiry, Rothman argued, was more of a theatrical performance than a serious diplomatic response. “It was that question and the lack of any satisfying answer to it that so offended Zelensky’s hosts,” he wrote. “A scene-chewing display of righteous indignation is what he got in response, not because he deserved it but because the performance has so effectively misdirected observers.”

Rothman criticized Republican lawmakers for rationalizing Trump’s stance despite knowing the risks it poses. “It has been nothing less than a national embarrassment to watch Republicans fish for a rationale that justifies what they’re talking themselves into. What they’re articulating is nothing short of a monarchical conception of America’s national mission, in which its geostrategic priorities are either set or altered in accordance with the prestige of one man.”

He warned that Trump’s alignment with Russia and his disregard for allies like Ukraine would have far-reaching consequences. “The makings of a transatlantic schism are apparent to all who are willing to honestly survey the geopolitical landscape without fear of the politically inconvenient conclusions that analysis may produce.

More: Trump Clashes with Zelensky as US Leaders Suggest He Should Resign After Heated Meeting
More: Donald Trump Calls America ‘Fat and Disgusting,’ But the Internet Claps Back: ‘He’s Talking About Himself’

And for what? To avenge the clearly pretextual slights of which Zelensky is accused, and to salve the egos of the executive branch’s temporary custodians? That’s not how we do things in America. At least, it wasn’t once.” Following Rothman’s column, Trump announced that the United States is temporarily pausing all military aid to Ukraine.

He stated that the delay is meant to review existing contracts, though many believe it is a strategic move to pressure Zelensky into accepting unfavorable terms in negotiations with Russia. This development has further deepened concerns about the United States’ commitment to its European allies, who have already invested billions in countering Russian aggression and may now be forced to face the challenge alone.

For You:

Related post